Part 3

[Silver]

Again, I have all the proof I need.

False. You have the delusion you require to believe in something for which there is no evidence to support its existence.

---

I really do have Proof of God.

False. That word proof does not mean what you think it means. Millions of people can claim that leprechauns are real and that they have personal proof of the existence of leprechauns, but if millions of others have no verifiable proof of those leprechauns' existences, then those leprechauns truly do not exist anywhere except in the minds of people who are too delusional to know fantasy from reality.

---

What better proof of God than God Himself?

Delusionally convincing one's self that something exists when there is no verifiable evidence to support its existence is something only performed by those who cannot differentiate fantasy from reality. Those who convince themselves that leprechauns are real have used the same method of supposed proof that you use, and you are no less crazy in the head just because your belief happens to revolve around god rather than leprechauns.

---

just look at the numbers of those who believe in a version of God verses those who don't.

As already mentioned, the argumentum ad populem fallacy is illogical. That millions of people who belong to the most intelligent race on the planet would be duped into believing a lie is the true wonder, no god involved either. Of course, indoctrination at a young age helps further the lie, does it not? Get them while their young and impressionable, feed them the lie every day of their growing lives. Sad.