Satan Disproves Christianity

[John V]

The gospel of Thomas perhaps?

Thomas is generally not dated before the earliest canonical writings.

Or that was based on the original source.

The speculative original source which hasn't been found.

I'm not trying to argue in favor of materialism necessarily. I would argue in favor of me not knowing and you don't know either. I think I have the high ground of honesty.

Huh? I freely admit to faith. You're dishonest to suggest otherwise.

Would you rather we keep working on it looking for new evidence, ideas and theories or should we give up and call it magic?

I don't care, unless it's being funded by a government grant, in which case I think the money could be better spent.