(January 16, 2010 at 10:49 am)tackattack Wrote: [quote='Zen Badger' pid='50527' dateline='1263648027'][hide]
[quote='tackattack' pid='50515' dateline='1263646038']
The fact it is written is implied since it is a book. Men can write, God doesn't that's also assumed. Since interpretation is subjective and God should be personal he probably assumed it would be individual (read as mis) interpreted. That is assuming that God has a consciouness. The machines at the Hershey Company make reese's pieces put people still argue which candy is the bestand how it's made. Me I appreciate the goodness of the end result (Sorry I'm really hungry and craving sweets).
I don't have a right interpretation, just my interpretation which is a right fit for me. I go about validating my interpretation with intuition, logic and trying the stip as much humanity out of the bible as possible.
Awful lot of assumptions in that post Tacka.
Though why God would need to make assumptions when he is All Knowing is a bit strange
wouldn't you think.
But again my point, Why didn't God make the Bible resistant to interpretation.
This is what I mean, no argument, no mistake, no changing! yours truly God.
He is Perfect( it is claimed) wouldn't His Word be as well?
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.