(September 22, 2013 at 3:18 am)Jiggerj Wrote:(September 22, 2013 at 3:06 am)gilbertc06 Wrote: We already know of naturally occurring patterns such as the fibonacci sequence. It is not unreasonable to say that there are numerical patterns in nature. But you then cannot make the leap to some sort of virtual reality on a computer. You need a sound argument backed up by solid proof for that.
Yeah, but this is one of those ideas where we don't really need proof. Even if true, no one will try to get you into a religion of computer simulation, and no one's going to kill in the name of...?..User1?
Ummm
You do still need proof. You never accept anything as true unless proved to a certain degree. You can think about this idea, but I would never believe unless given ample evidence.
