Evolution Trumps Creationism

[Esquilax]

You said I ad hoc'ed a theory, when in fact all I did was underscore that there is no biblical time lines in creation account. Which means everything evolution says is biblically possible.

Um, actually...

So, for starters, even if we don't have biblical timelines for events, we do know for a fact that planets and stars do not form in a day, which puts a crimp in your "seven literal days," theory right from the start.

But that's got nothing to do with evolution, though. That's cosmology. In terms of evolution, your biblical account simply does not match with the fossil record no matter how far back we go. To begin with, we see evidence of human cultures well before your claim that the fall of man happened 6,000 years ago. All over the earth, there are cultures older than that, and we can demonstrate that they were there with ease. Secondly, our evolutionary lineage from ape ancestors to man is very well plotted, as shown in this list of human transitional fossils. This is in direct contradiction to your claim that man was created whole in the garden; we simply demonstrably were not.

So, evolution and a literal reading of genesis are at odds. That's just the way it is.

Which is a thought I have never seen or argued before, which would indicate an 'open minded' thought process. Your appeal to one stereotype after another, and then told me I was close minded. This is what gave my irony meter cancer.

If you were open minded you would have exposed yourself to some biology textbooks, and never would have resorted to that idiotic "evolved from slime" canard.