(September 29, 2013 at 1:04 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: I also want to add something drich. If your not willing to provide any evidence of your illness, then why do you pass it as evidence of god? Do you think people will take your word for such a claim. I would never expect people to just take my word for something like that.
Can I just argue the flipside on this one.
When arguments like this come up I have to ask myself the question - would I lie about something like this?
The answer is no.
I will not, therefore, assume that someone else would. To do this is to accept Christian thinking (everyone is basically a savage without Jesus).
I therefore accept Drich's claim that he had aids and further surmise that he is in remission.
Here's the thing: Remission is something medicine does not really understand (a bit like the placebo affect).
So we have Drich in remission and he thinks God did it.
Lets say you manage to persuade him otherwise. Then his aids returns and he dies - but you won the argument on the internet - right?
To me its not worth the victory, but that's just me.