RE: Atheist or really Agnostic
September 30, 2013 at 7:37 am
(This post was last modified: September 30, 2013 at 7:38 am by SavedByGraceThruFaith.)
(September 30, 2013 at 6:58 am)Rationalman Wrote:(September 30, 2013 at 6:44 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: To truly be an atheist is to claim that there in no God.Not true, all you have to do to be an atheist is disbelieve
(September 30, 2013 at 6:44 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Because of this, it is impossible to absolutely claim that there is no God.Correct, in the same way that it is impossible to absolutely claim that there his a god
(September 30, 2013 at 6:44 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: A person could be fairly convinced of their position, but they could not prove it. In essence they would logically have to be an agnostic, with a personal belief that to the best of their knowledge, there is no God. But then logically they are agnostic. They really do not know.You know you can be both right, the terms aren't mutually exclusive
To believe that God exists does not require an absolute negation at all. It just needs positive evidence that God exists. So there is no comparison.
I believe the Holy Bible is true.
It claims to be from God Almighty.
It proves itself in many ways.
The atheists does not have a book which claims to be from their supreme being. It would say "I am God I do not exist"
The Holy Bible is a record of historical events. These events show that God exist.
The atheist has no record of the no God''s actions.
The saved have the witness of the Holy Spirit in them.
The atheists has the witness of the nobody.
The existence of the universe is a very strong proof of the existence of its Creator.
The atheist must try to explain it away.
All attempts have failed.