RE: Satan Disproves Christianity
October 1, 2013 at 2:45 pm
(This post was last modified: October 1, 2013 at 2:59 pm by Godscreated.)
(October 1, 2013 at 10:22 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Well GC before we go any farther I want to know how do you define love?
How I define love has no bearing here.

(October 1, 2013 at 1:26 am)max-greece Wrote: "The genealogy in Luke is Mary's, thus Heli was the father-in-law of Joseph. The genealogy in Matthew is Joseph's and Jacob was his father. Luke gives prominence to women in his gospel, it thus is why he used Mary's genealogy and during those times it would have been natural for Joseph's father-in-law to call him son."
Say what?
"He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli......"
There is just no way that is son-in-law. The point of this long list is to show that Jesus comes from the line of David and both Luke and Matthew attempt to do this through Joseph (wrongly as it happens). The son-in-law explanation isn't supported anywhere and is obviously someone's brilliant idea of how to get out of an error in the story.
Luke was written in Greek. Greek has perfectly usable words for son-in-law to differentiate it from son. If it meant son-in-law it would have said it.
You need to prove I'm wrong. Nothing you said has proved a thing.

(October 1, 2013 at 2:37 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:(October 1, 2013 at 2:35 pm)Godschild Wrote: I knew that when I started and I'm glad you confirmed that the nonbelievers here care for nothing but winning an argument, truth has no part of their lives. I've shown I'm willing to do the work and the nonbelievers will prove they care nothing for posting and then trying to investigate what the truth might be.
GC
Boy thats not arrogant or nothing.
The reason I did that C&P was to prove a point, the bible contradicts and you failed to refute that.
Then quit making accusations and get busy disproving what I wrote, or are you just to lazy.

(October 1, 2013 at 2:41 pm)max-greece Wrote: If you're going to be condescending:
"Agreeing with it would mean studying what was said and most nonbelievers hear are to lazy to seek knowledge. "
non-believers
here
too lazy
Three errors in the punchline isn't the way to do it.
Sorry if the truth hurts, what I've posted in the last few minutes is not condescending it's the truth, remember what I said in the thread we had such a good conversation.

I knew this was going to happen, you all come out putting down what I said, using no proof, yet you demand proof from Christians, you are a dishonest bunch who have little to no truth about you. Call me arrogant, condescending or what ever, I do not care, the truth is what it is!

God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.