Sorry if I asserted things not attributable to you. I will research this Kantian stance of absolute reality.
I do agree that by definition thought (to include ideas, assumptions, perspective, etc.) is subjective and relative. I contend that it's not always as unreliable as they are painted. I'm not trying to redefine words, just trying to get a grasp on the differences between definition, connotation and perception. So after all this we have objective truth and subjective truth. If I look at it on a scale @ 90% of the truths are on one side and are subjective and the elusive objective truths are on the other. I'd like to gradiate the scale of subjective information/truth to at least uniformely accepted subjective truth (blue is blue) and personal subjective truth (completely true to individuals ie. I prefer steak over chicken) and irrational subjective truth (no one believes in unicorns you idiot).
1) OK I dind't intentionally leave out LoEM just cited a few examples. So they are axioms, where do you suppose they stem from? We agree they require no proof and are assumptions that could change but haven't yet. I barely am grasping quantum physics.. I don't think I'm ready for quantum logic just let
2) OK so anything is possibible. Everytime I have touched fire it's hot, but won't necessarily next time. Arrived at through begging the question of inductive reasoning. How then can you know anything without faith? Logic isn't a direct correlation to reality, but it holds informational uniformly accepted subjective truth. With a little faith the statement , "Fire is hot to me, isn't it hot to you?" then shouldn't be contested.
I do agree that by definition thought (to include ideas, assumptions, perspective, etc.) is subjective and relative. I contend that it's not always as unreliable as they are painted. I'm not trying to redefine words, just trying to get a grasp on the differences between definition, connotation and perception. So after all this we have objective truth and subjective truth. If I look at it on a scale @ 90% of the truths are on one side and are subjective and the elusive objective truths are on the other. I'd like to gradiate the scale of subjective information/truth to at least uniformely accepted subjective truth (blue is blue) and personal subjective truth (completely true to individuals ie. I prefer steak over chicken) and irrational subjective truth (no one believes in unicorns you idiot).
1) OK I dind't intentionally leave out LoEM just cited a few examples. So they are axioms, where do you suppose they stem from? We agree they require no proof and are assumptions that could change but haven't yet. I barely am grasping quantum physics.. I don't think I'm ready for quantum logic just let
2) OK so anything is possibible. Everytime I have touched fire it's hot, but won't necessarily next time. Arrived at through begging the question of inductive reasoning. How then can you know anything without faith? Logic isn't a direct correlation to reality, but it holds informational uniformly accepted subjective truth. With a little faith the statement , "Fire is hot to me, isn't it hot to you?" then shouldn't be contested.
