(October 4, 2013 at 9:20 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: Abiogenesis is impossible
To prove that all life forms came to be without God, evolutionary theory must show that atoms somehow formed into some form of life and then evolved upward to mankind.
You know by now that evolution does not include abiogenesis. Get over it already.
Quote:That first part of that, abiogenesis, is impossible. Also whatever that first creature was, it will not evolve upward to the first living cell.
Why is it impossible? Because you say so? Hmmm, why am I not convinced?

Quote:So some evolutionists came up with a scheme to hide all that impossibility. They said that evolution does not include abiogenesis (life from non-life) and that abiogenesis is a separate topic.
No, nobody "came up with a scheme". That's like saying chemists "came up with" physics so they didn't have to explain atoms.
Quote:So they take the atoms to mankind task and divide it into separate pieces. But the 2 pieces do not add up to the whole task, thus hiding the impossible parts by leaving them out of both pieces.
Now if you honestly divide the atoms to mankind task into 2 pieces, you have atoms to the first living creature in the first part, and the same first living creature evolving upward up to mankind in the second part. But that is not what evolutionists do. They take abiogenesis and make the first living thing as small as possible. (BTW - even that can be proven false) and start with a much larger and advanced creature for the second part. That gap is a great deception. That tiny little theorized first thing (which they still do not state what it is) could never cross that gap and evolve to the more advanced creature.
There is no "evolving upward". You seem to presume that evolution not only has direction, but has man as a goal. That is not what evolution is.
Quote:The conundrum is if the first living creature is too small and primitive, then it could not even survive, reproduce, and evolve up to an RNA or DNA based creature.
Why could whatever it is you're defining not survive? Do you know the conditions?
Quote:But if the first living creature is advanced, then the already impossible odds against abiogenesis become so mind-boggling against it.
You haven't defined "living". Or "creature". Or "advanced". You're just pontificating.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.