(October 4, 2013 at 3:37 pm)Drich Wrote:You are being intellectually dishonest. No where in the verses you showed says anything about a neighbour being someone who is close by. If that would be true then the robbers, priest and levite would be classified as neighbours, which is incorrect since only the one who showed mercy is classified as the neighbour. If you cannot admit your error here you are a liar.(September 29, 2013 at 6:53 am)Waratah Wrote: this was a neighbor? In luke 11-5 to 13 it clearly states that it is a friend, NOT a neighbour. Why do you insist saying it was a neighbour?As i pointed out Christ identifies anyone in procximity to you as your neighbor. Hence the parable of the Good sameritian. Therefore if your in proxcimity to a friend he then also considered a neighbor.
Quote:Being dishonest again drich. where you use the term neighbour instead of friend. I say you are lying since you use the term for both the person wanting the bread and the one not want to give it. It is quite clear in this post that the reason you do not use the term friend is because one of my arguments relies on the fact that they are friends.Quote:The following only answers your question, it would be relevant if you could prove that all neighbours are friends...I proved that Christ considers all who you come in contact with to be considered as neighbors this includes friends. I simply used the term to distinguish between the 'friend' in the house who had the bread, verses the friend/neighbor outside, and the 'friend' who the bread was for.
Well from now on let us agree that when jesus said “Suppose you have a friend, and you go to him at midnight and say," that friend here stays as friend and not neighbour. This means that there was no seeking in the context of finding in the parable.
Quote:Here we are still talking about your use of neighbour not verse 13. Here I am pointing out that the friend is not a neighbour going by christs standards due to him not helping his friend straight away. Or are you saying that the friend did get up straight away to help him? Now that would certainly change things.Quote:Plus the friend only gave the loaves to get rid of the friend not due to kindness. You are being intellectually dishonest.Which is why Christ said:
13 Even you who are bad know how to give good things to your children. So surely your heavenly Father knows how to give the Holy Spirit to the people who ask him.”
Quote:You are such a liar. [u]Here is your post where you said
Quote:Question the conversion of asking into knocking. To knock simple means to repeat the process, or to keep seeking and to keep asking. (Like you have done In Your hound dogging me)
Christ tells us to do this in: 9 “So I say to you: Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. 10 For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.
Quote:Where in those 2 verses does it say either to keep asking repeatedly or that asking turns into a knocking.I did not say asking turns into knocking.
"knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed."
If you got this wrong what else are you wrong about drich?
Quote:and it says to keep A/S/K repeatedly here: I tell you, maybe friendship is not enough to make him get up to give you the bread. But he will surely get up to give you what you need if you continue to ask. 9 So I tell you, continue to ask, and God will give to you. Continue to search, and you will find. Continue to knock, and the door will open for you. 10 Yes, whoever continues to ask will receive. Whoever continues to look will find. And whoever continues to knock will have the door opened for them.Why cut off my quote? Full quote is
Quote:Here is drich trying to set up another out by not even trying to answer the question honestly.Nuupe. I've answered this question 10 times now with the same verse. You do not see it as an answer because your strawman has me saying asking turns into knocking.
Quote:So now I am forced to ask again and he will say "but I already answered that question". Sorry drich you and everyone else knows...Which is why several of your brothers in arms have conceeded the point for you.
"So now I am forced to ask again and he will say "but I already answered that question". Sorry drich you and everyone else knows that the only answer is that asking does not turn into knocking."
Quote:You have removed quotes here. My reply of "No seeking or knocking there to get the holy spirit, only ask." was in reply to verse luke 11-13Quote:Your answer once again has nothing to do with the question. Avoiding questions. Reminds me of one of your threads. hock: The question came about because you asserted that the repeated asking makes it a knock.Nupe. Again this is the reason this discussion has stalled, you have asserted my position revolves around me saying Asking=knocking.
Quote:No seeking or knocking there to get the holy spirit, only ask. Non answer again.Indeed which is what I have said from the beginning.
If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!”
Finally drich admits that there is no seeking or knocking to get the holy spirit. The part he got wrong is the "said from the beginning.". Please show me where you have said this in the beginning?
Quote:See above where I have proven proximity has nothing to do with neighbours.Quote:In luke 11-5 to 13 it clearly states that it is a friend, NOT a neighbour. Why do you insist saying it was a neighbour?Because the man at the door and the man in the house were in proxcimity to one another which Jesus identifies as neighbors.
Quote:You just said above that there is no seeking or knocking to get the holy spirit. You do not find the holy spirit, it is given according to verse luke 11-13Quote:Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?first you show me where I said asking converts to knocking.
Quote:How many asks does it take to equal a knock?Again first you show me where I said asking converts to knocking.
Quote:Please show me what will be found if I "seek"? No assumptions please.It is a three part process as I already pointed out we are supposed to be A/S/K for the Holy Spirit. Therefore we will receive the Holy Spirit.
As Per Christ's words:13 Even you who are bad know how to give good things to your children. So surely your heavenly Father knows how to give the Holy Spirit to the people who ask him.”
If you then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him!”
Where in the above verse is there any seeking? There is none. So why do you use verse 13 to try and prove your a/s/k when there is no seeking? Non answer again.
Quote:But you agree there is no knocking to receive the holy spirit when you statedQuote:Please show me what will be opened if I "knock"? No assumptions please."The Door" What door? The door in Heaven That is currently keeping you from the Holy Spirit.
"Indeed which is what I have said from the beginning."
I said no assumptions please. Non answer again
Quote:Quote:Do you understand the following?So the answer is you do not understand the above. Christ did not give the formula a/s/k, it is you. You still have to prove that to receive the holy spirit you must seek and/or knock with ask to receive.
I will state again that in luke 11 it says that to receive the holy spirit you must ask. Read luke 11-13. It is as simple as that.
Quote:Quote:If you cannot answer honestly I will just have to accept that a/s/k is bullshit as I have proven to you before and you have failed to prove otherwise.
Thanks for playing.
and when I do? will you conceed the point and receive Christ as your Lord and savior??? No you say?!?!? I'm shocked, oh, wait no im not, because i know you just want to argue something ad naseum so you may simply have the last word, and then proclaim victory, but now that you took a break[/u] away from the arguement, and everyone else gets it and has backed off, i have gotten my second wind and can go around and around another month if you like.
Drich you are a liar as I have proven in this post and in previous posts. What you say is worthless. As I said answer honestly or I will have to accept a/s/k is bullshit. You have failed to answer honestly therefore a/s/k is bullshit.
You have proven that either your comprehension skills are lacking or your are intellectually dishonest. Which one it is only your can truly answer that, but you seem to have selective comprehension skills. That is why I believe is is the latter.