The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

Thank you for the picture.

Tuff 8: 3.46 +- 0.12 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.56 +- 0.2 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.78 +- 0.04 Ma

So they could be

Tuff 8: 3.58 Ma
Tuff 7: 3.36 Ma
Tuff 6: 3.74 Ma

So Tuff 7 could be younger than the layer above.

So they could be out of order.

That picture proved the topic's post.

So essentially, you picked some numbers out of your ass, randomly applied them to create a logically untenable conclusion, and somehow this is supposed to make science look silly?

I can do that too, you know: Man is created in god's image, god is depicted as having a beard, I don't have a beard, and therefore god doesn't exist.

You can prove practically anything if you're allowed to use the language in a sufficiently elastic manner, but that doesn't mean you've reached a correct conclusion.

I used the numbers is the picture. I just applied the +- in a way consistent with the range. It did show that the interpretation of the layers could be false.