(October 6, 2013 at 11:00 pm)whateverist Wrote:(October 6, 2013 at 7:04 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: But the changes are random and not directed by an intelligence. So they are errors.
I assume I'm too late, but to be "errors" there would have to be some intent gone awry. Now if the copying was intended by your god to go flawlessly but messed up, you'd have to give up some degree of omni-.
But without intent, changes are just changes.
(October 6, 2013 at 2:27 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: But all individuals of all species are accumulating the same longterm corruption. There is nothing that will make it.
I think I see the problem. You're assuming the DNA was created perfect and so any variation away from that is corruption. Just a bad assumption and easily fixed. (Give it up.)
1. Many diseases, chronic conditions, and even death are the product of 1 or a few mutations. So those are for sure "errors." Not all are weeded out by natural selection.
2. I do not assume that DNA is perfect. You assume that random changes can produce complex interrelated new design. That is not what is observed at all. In fact the odds are so against it. so that is another proof against evolution.
So since no complex interrelated new design can occur, the DNA changes do corrupt the genome.