RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 7, 2013 at 5:41 pm
(October 7, 2013 at 2:14 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 7, 2013 at 1:49 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: I'm guessing that all science is wrong, unless it were to show that there was a guy named Jesus who lived some 2000 years ago, then science is infallible.
I never said that all science is wrong. Just the false origin science part.
I love science. I just do not like false science.
Do you know what the difference is between genesis, and the theory of abiogenesis?
Abiogenesis is a theory being eeked out through alot of hard work, because biology has one of the highest standard of evidence in the sciences. The reason for this is that biology is far more easily tested.
now more to my point is that if you wanted you could perform the miller uray experiment at at home, just have to spend a little money and do a lot of reading.
Can you propose e a experiment to test god??
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
