RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 6:43 am
(October 8, 2013 at 12:19 am)Esquilax Wrote:(October 7, 2013 at 8:15 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: 1. Genetics is true. Atoms to mankind has been disproven entirely.
You're wrong. I already proved this. It's been proved.
Quote:2. If you think that simple genetics is proof of atoms to mankind theory of evolution, you are blind. The fact that this is being used as the "proof" of the atoms to man theory of evolution, proves beyond all doubt that there is NO proof whatsoever. That is a desperate attempt that has failed.
The fact that all you can do is baselessly deny the reality proves beyond all doubt that there is NO proof whatsoever. That is a desperate attempt that has failed. God is no more.
Quote:4. You have absolutely not a single fact, not based on an assumption, of anything older than 6000 years ago. The "facts" you referred to are based on assumptions.
I wonder if the people worshiping at this eleven thousand year old temple had trouble with the fact that the universe hadn't been created around them yet? And it's weird how the earth was created six thousand years ago, but we knew how to brew alcohol nine thousand years ago, isn't it?
You just have assumptions and live in denial.
Does the temple have a date on it? Like 11000 BC.
Prove it is 11,000 years old.
