Mutations disprove the theory of upward evolution

[Chas]

Ah. You missed my post 139 back on page 14 where I pointed out that your misunderstanding of the scientific claims of the theory of evolution are so profoundly wrong that the evidence you expect to support evolution would actually disprove it. A cat giving birth to a dog without artificial intervention would disprove evolution. It would prove that a new species can arise from another family without thousands of generations in which variation and natural selection can interact.

In the theory of evolution, every organism is the same species as the generation that produced it. Trying to spot evolution in action in a single generation is like trying to track the development of a child by taking a snapshot of it, and then taking another picture five minutes later. Thinking that shows children don't grow and develop is the caliber of mistake made when concluding evolution doesn't happen if it isn't visible in a few generations.

When the people defining terms are blinded by the already proven false assumption of No God, why would I be bound by there false conclusions and non logical thinking.

So you are arguing against that which you refuse to even try to understand.

You are pathetic.