(October 8, 2013 at 11:57 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: When the people defining terms are blinded by the already proven false assumption of No God, why would I be bound by there false conclusions and non logical thinking.And STILL repeating the same strawman. Grace, you have been told time and time again that no such assumption exists in the scientific method.
But it's interesting that you accept some principles- such as the structure of DNA and its changeability- which were discovered by the same scientific method you deplore. If science is so atheistic, how can you trust any of its conclusions at all? How do you REALLY know that DNA exists, or that mutations occur? Hadn't you better just deny ALL of it, just to be on the safe side of Pascal's wager?