RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm
(October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The background radiation may vary but not 20 to 1.
I don't believe anyone claimed that it did.
(October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: The tree rings cannot be used because they cannot correct for the 20X CO2 in the presence of less radiation hitting the atmosphere
20x, as pointed out to you, was on the order of 500 million years ago, many orders of magnitude longer ago than the date ranges in question. It's irrelevant to the question.
Do you have any idea why there was so much more CO2 500 million years ago than now, and so little free oxygen. Hmm, I wonder what that might be. (hint: plants)
(October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: before the flood.
Please, pull the other one.
(October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: You also do not have 11,000 years of tree ring history.
Wrong.
Quote:Currently, the maximum for fully anchored chronologies is a little over 11,000 years from present.[1]
McGovern PJ, et al. (1995). Dendrochronology. "Science in Archaeology: A Review". AJA 99 (1): 79–142.
It's abundantly clear to everyone here that you're pulling this stuff out of your ass.
