The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

[max-greece]

And she still hasn't come up with a plausible reason for why we can see so much universe when it's only 6000 years old.

This one has to be one of the stupider cretinists we have had. And that's saying something.

You have no evidence about the shape of space over large distances.

You have no evidence of the speed of light over large distances.

But I will tell you that the original Big Bang theory was proven wrong, so they had to add the theory of inflation to the Big Bang theory.

There is no proof of inflation.

And the Big Bang is still false, since it violates a number of scientific principle and laws.

Gracie, Gracie Gracie.....

We covered this - remember? You accepted Relativity and the size of the universe - no-one forced you to do it - you volunteered.

So we accept the speed of light over any distance.

But what we did, you and I, was to look at something not at the edges of space, something close by. In fact we looked at the Andromeda Galaxy - remember? The nearest spiral galaxy to us at 2.5 million light years - you do remember this don't you?

Now that means that it took light 2.5 million years to get here - because we accepted Einstein - so the fact that we can see it PROVES the universe to be more than 6,000 years old.

We did it together - remember? Although to be honest it was mostly your own work.

How do you manage to forget these things overnight - every night?