The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

[SavedByGraceThruFaith]

You have no evidence about the shape of space over large distances.

You have no evidence of the speed of light over large distances.

But I will tell you that the original Big Bang theory was proven wrong, so they had to add the theory of inflation to the Big Bang theory.

There is no proof of inflation.

And the Big Bang is still false, since it violates a number of scientific principle and laws.

Gracie, Gracie Gracie.....

We covered this - remember? You accepted Relativity and the size of the universe - no-one forced you to do it - you volunteered.

So we accept the speed of light over any distance.

But what we did, you and I, was to look at something not at the edges of space, something close by. In fact we looked at the Andromeda Galaxy - remember? The nearest spiral galaxy to us at 2.5 million light years - you do remember this don't you?

Now that means that it took light 2.5 million years to get here - because we accepted Einstein - so the fact that we can see it PROVES the universe to be more than 6,000 years old.

We did it together - remember? Although to be honest it was mostly your own work.

How do you manage to forget these things overnight - every night?

Relativity does not prove the age of the universe at all.

Where did you conjure up that notion?

You do not know that shape of space over large distances.
You do not know the speed of light over large distances.
That is a false conjecture on your part based on the blindness of an already proven false assumption of no God.

Remember the Big Bang theory violates a number of scientific laws and principles.

What was there before the Big Bang?
What caused the Big Bang?