RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 7:34 am
(October 9, 2013 at 7:30 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(October 9, 2013 at 6:41 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: You have no evidence about the shape of space over large distances.
You have no evidence of the speed of light over large distances.
But I will tell you that the original Big Bang theory was proven wrong, so they had to add the theory of inflation to the Big Bang theory.
There is no proof of inflation.
And the Big Bang is still false, since it violates a number of scientific principle and laws.
I'm not asking you to disprove the Big Bang.
I'm asking you to demonstrate how the observable universe is observable If it is only 6000yo.
A scientist David Russell Humphreys already has 1 theory that explains it.
But you are missing the point. The "no God" assumption has been disproved. It can never be used in the determination of the age of the universe.
I brought up the Big Bang because that will further disprove the "no God" assumption.
What was there before the Big Bang?
What caused it?