The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: April 24, 2026, 11:58 am

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

Chas

Terse.

Religious Views: atheist

Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation: 54

#188

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely

October 9, 2013 at 7:51 am

(October 9, 2013 at 7:38 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 7:36 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: So I guess redshift is simply the change your face makes as atheists refuse your proof, Gracie?

David Russell Humphreys already developed a model that accounts for the red shift.

But you miss the point.

The "no God" assumption has already been proven false.

Therefore the "no God" assumption can never be used in determining the age question.

There is no 'no god assumption', merely no 'god assumption'.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 5, 2013 at 4:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 5, 2013 at 4:23 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 4:24 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 5, 2013 at 4:26 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 5, 2013 at 9:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 5, 2013 at 10:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 3:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 3:49 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 6:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 6:29 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 7:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 7:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Simon Moon - October 5, 2013 at 4:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 4:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Airyaman - October 5, 2013 at 4:30 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Simon Moon - October 5, 2013 at 4:42 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Darwinian - October 5, 2013 at 5:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 5, 2013 at 5:53 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by KichigaiNeko - October 5, 2013 at 9:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:23 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 6:35 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 5, 2013 at 6:57 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:59 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 5, 2013 at 6:51 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 5, 2013 at 6:56 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Minimalist - October 5, 2013 at 9:21 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Airyaman - October 5, 2013 at 9:43 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Minimalist - October 5, 2013 at 9:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 6, 2013 at 2:23 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 4:01 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by KichigaiNeko - October 6, 2013 at 6:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 8:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 8:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 8:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 9:01 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 6, 2013 at 10:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 6, 2013 at 11:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 11:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 6, 2013 at 11:30 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 6, 2013 at 2:58 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 4:05 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 11:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 6, 2013 at 8:23 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Mothonis - October 6, 2013 at 8:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 6, 2013 at 8:35 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 6, 2013 at 8:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:20 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 4:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:27 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 4:29 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 6, 2013 at 4:34 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 6, 2013 at 5:17 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Heir Apparent - October 6, 2013 at 6:24 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 1:49 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 2:14 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 2:35 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 7, 2013 at 3:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 7, 2013 at 5:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 2:17 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 7, 2013 at 2:20 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 2:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 7, 2013 at 3:27 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 7, 2013 at 2:46 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 6:56 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by ThomM - October 7, 2013 at 7:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 7, 2013 at 8:15 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 7, 2013 at 8:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 12:19 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 6:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 6:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 7:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:32 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 7:35 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 8, 2013 at 9:56 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 7, 2013 at 8:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cinjin - October 7, 2013 at 9:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 7, 2013 at 9:36 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 7, 2013 at 9:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 7, 2013 at 10:45 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 7, 2013 at 11:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:25 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 7, 2013 at 11:31 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 7, 2013 at 11:45 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 8, 2013 at 7:29 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tonus - October 8, 2013 at 7:39 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:44 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cinjin - October 8, 2013 at 12:15 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 6:52 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 6:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:22 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:31 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 8, 2013 at 1:05 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 1:41 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 1:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 2:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 1:59 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 2:22 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 2:40 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 2:58 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 3:16 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 3:33 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 3:50 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:32 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:37 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:17 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:39 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by LastPoet - October 8, 2013 at 7:45 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 7:52 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 7:58 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 7:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 8:12 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 8, 2013 at 8:25 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 8:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:38 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 8:44 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 8:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ben Davis - October 8, 2013 at 9:33 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 9:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 9:18 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 12:01 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 10:10 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 11:49 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 8, 2013 at 12:09 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Jackalope - October 8, 2013 at 12:00 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 8:21 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 8, 2013 at 8:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 8, 2013 at 9:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 9:06 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 8, 2013 at 9:08 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by popeyespappy - October 8, 2013 at 9:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 1:42 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Lemonvariable72 - October 8, 2013 at 9:26 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 12:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 1:04 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 1:07 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 1:11 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 8, 2013 at 1:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 8, 2013 at 1:18 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 1:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 8, 2013 at 2:02 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 2:12 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 2:28 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 8, 2013 at 2:32 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 8, 2013 at 2:36 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 8, 2013 at 2:48 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 8, 2013 at 2:53 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Ryantology - October 8, 2013 at 8:52 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 8, 2013 at 9:38 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 9, 2013 at 1:27 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 2:54 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 8, 2013 at 3:08 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Anomalocaris - October 8, 2013 at 3:21 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Tiberius - October 8, 2013 at 3:25 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Cyberman - October 8, 2013 at 3:30 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 5:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 6:41 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 6:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 8:09 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 8:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 8:53 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 10:00 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 10:53 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 9:48 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 7:30 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:34 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 7:59 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 9, 2013 at 7:36 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 7:38 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 9, 2013 at 7:51 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Captain Colostomy - October 9, 2013 at 7:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Crossless1 - October 9, 2013 at 7:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Esquilax - October 9, 2013 at 7:55 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 9, 2013 at 8:19 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 9, 2013 at 10:02 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 9, 2013 at 10:04 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Psykhronic - October 9, 2013 at 10:11 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Fidel_Castronaut - October 9, 2013 at 11:34 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 11:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 9, 2013 at 11:45 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 9, 2013 at 11:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Angrboda - October 9, 2013 at 11:57 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 9:16 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 10, 2013 at 10:26 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 10:28 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Chas - October 10, 2013 at 10:43 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 10, 2013 at 10:47 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 10, 2013 at 2:00 pm

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by SavedByGraceThruFaith - October 12, 2013 at 6:31 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Zen Badger - October 14, 2013 at 6:05 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by pocaracas - October 9, 2013 at 11:54 am

RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by Doubting Thomas - October 10, 2013 at 1:23 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Good Christians only may answer...	Gawdzilla Sama	58	19662	September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm Last Post: Bob Kelso
	While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it	Rakie	17	6631	August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
	Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage	Rarieo	80	35540	July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am Last Post: Astonished
	Christianity actually condones murder	Rolandson	50	18038	January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
	Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation	Astonished	47	12509	January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet
	Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity	Rolandson	10	3491	January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am Last Post: Redoubtable
	What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe?	Fromper	66	34292	June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm Last Post: vorlon13
	You Can't Disprove a Miracle	Rhondazvous	155	33762	March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am Last Post: Cyberman
	Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion!	WishfulThinking	265	95005	October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am Last Post: Cyberman
	Dear Christians: What does your god actually do?	Aractus	144	72119	October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am Last Post: robvalue

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me