RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 7:59 am
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2013 at 8:05 am by Zen Badger.)
(October 9, 2013 at 7:34 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:(October 9, 2013 at 7:30 am)Zen Badger Wrote: I'm not asking you to disprove the Big Bang.
I'm asking you to demonstrate how the observable universe is observable If it is only 6000yo.
A scientist David Russell Humphreys already has 1 theory that explains it.
But you are missing the point. The "no God" assumption has been disproved. It can never be used in the determination of the age of the universe.
I brought up the Big Bang because that will further disprove the "no God" assumption.
What was there before the Big Bang?
What caused it?
Yes he does, it is shit as it makes no testable predictions at all. And does not explain how light got from the edge of the universe to us in 6000 years.
Anything else?
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.