RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
October 9, 2013 at 10:00 am
(October 9, 2013 at 8:53 am)max-greece Wrote:(October 9, 2013 at 8:11 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: David Russell Humphreys already has a cosmology model that uses relativity, solves the light problem and the universe is created 6000 years ago.
But the no God assumption is false.
It cannot be used in the age question.
David Russell Humphreys has a cosmology model that uses relativity that solves the light problem for DISTANT objects.
I didn't choose a distant object. Even if time were running slowly on Earth it would be running slowly on Andromeda too - its our neighbour - remember.
So Andromeda would be in Humphreys' great gravitational depression along with our solar system.
Still needs 2.5 million years. (Are you feeling a bit setup now?) Did ya think I didn't know of Humpreys' (actually flawed) theory?
Nice, but predicable try.
Actually Humpreys theory does solve the starlight problem. Whether you agree with his theory is another issue.
You still do not understand that the "no God" assumption is false, so you cannot use it in the determination of age.
Please show the measurement of the speed of light and the shape of space over large distances.