Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 30, 2025, 10:03 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely
(October 9, 2013 at 10:00 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote:
(October 9, 2013 at 8:53 am)max-greece Wrote: David Russell Humphreys has a cosmology model that uses relativity that solves the light problem for DISTANT objects.

I didn't choose a distant object. Even if time were running slowly on Earth it would be running slowly on Andromeda too - its our neighbour - remember.

So Andromeda would be in Humphreys' great gravitational depression along with our solar system.

Still needs 2.5 million years. (Are you feeling a bit setup now?) Did ya think I didn't know of Humpreys' (actually flawed) theory?

Nice, but predicable try.

Actually Humpreys theory does solve the starlight problem. Whether you agree with his theory is another issue.

You still do not understand that the "no God" assumption is false, so you cannot use it in the determination of age.

Please show the measurement of the speed of light and the shape of space over large distances.

How do you want me to show you the measurement of the speed of light?

Will a url suffice?

We are not talking about space over large distances - remember Gracie? We are talking about our neighbour galaxy, Andromeda. That's why I chose it.

Right now I am happy to use his theory (even though its largely discredited) because it doesn't apply in this case. He can explain distant objects - but not near ones that yield ages older than the 6,000 years he is aiming at. This is merely one of the problems - his sea salinity proof also needs about 10 times the age he is aiming at.

Forgot the damn link:

http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/wav...dence.html

Its a lovely simple one I used for my daughter when she was about 8 - you should be able to get it too Gracie.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The dates given by AOS for past events may actually disprove evolution entirely - by max-greece - October 9, 2013 at 10:53 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Good Christians only may answer... Gawdzilla Sama 58 14835 September 18, 2018 at 3:22 pm
Last Post: Bob Kelso
  While Judaism may have had forced marriage war booties, i think it reasons is for it Rakie 17 5343 August 2, 2017 at 2:17 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Lol the bible is actually ok with pedophilia, proof from passage Rarieo 80 29392 July 29, 2017 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Christianity actually condones murder Rolandson 50 14026 January 21, 2017 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Truth in a story which is entirely dependent upon subjective interpretation Astonished 47 9249 January 10, 2017 at 8:57 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Catholicism would actually be the most likely controlled Christianity Rolandson 10 2804 January 1, 2017 at 11:44 am
Last Post: Redoubtable
  What do non-fundamentalist Christians actually believe? Fromper 66 29561 June 30, 2016 at 7:08 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  You Can't Disprove a Miracle Rhondazvous 155 24085 March 18, 2016 at 11:05 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 75566 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
Question Dear Christians: What does your god actually do? Aractus 144 61964 October 9, 2015 at 6:38 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)