Some Simple Questions show Atheistic Origin Science is false (proof 2 begins)

[Crossless2.0]

You would not. The rules would have to be agreed to by both participants.

Well if I have absolute say over all rules then maybe.

You are a fucking child. Let me guess, your rules would look something like this:

1) I [Grace] will never have to provide a shred of positive evidence for any of my claims;

2) I may misrepresent my opponent's position;

3) I may misrepresent legitimate science in post after post and will never concede that I am being dishonest or don't know what I'm talking about;

4) I will discount out of hand any evidence presented by my opponent;

5) My opponent must exhaustively explain every aspect of science related to the topic (including showing all calculations) while I will be permitted to appeal to magic as an explanation for everything I don't understand (which is pretty much everything);

6) I get to make shit up as it suits my purposes; and,

7) Regardless of the actual outcome of the debate, I will declare victory.

Is that about right, you miserable troll?