(October 9, 2013 at 2:33 pm)John V Wrote:(October 9, 2013 at 2:04 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: I did. However it does not matter since you have no evidence to present,Sure I do - the Bible. You might not accept it personally, but it fits your definition.
Quote:an since different religions vary wildly then how could you claim to have a standard of evidence defined by the community?Religions vary widely, but evidence for them doesn't. For most it's documentary testimonial evidence.
No, the Bible does not meet any reasonable standard of evidence.
It is full of historical inaccuracies, incorrect claims about the physical world, internal contradictions, morality fit for hell, and sections of pure craziness.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
