OK so if you as a Christian don't believe in any of the myths in the bible except one, then why should I also accept that one particular myth? I honestly don't know which is worse, a Christian who claims that the bible is 100% irrefutably true down to the last word, or a Christian who says that all the stories in it are made up horseshit except for that one about Jesus dying for people's sins and being resurrected.
It's like you're so close to understanding that the bible, the entire source document for Christianity, is just a false collection of myths invented by superstitious bronze age goat herders, but you're still hung up on that one particular story being true.
It's like you're so close to understanding that the bible, the entire source document for Christianity, is just a false collection of myths invented by superstitious bronze age goat herders, but you're still hung up on that one particular story being true.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
