What Was Before ' the Beginning '....?

[Captain Colostomy]

---

Really - and you know this how exactly?

Observation, logic, deduction. A little bit of faith as I don't claim to know for certain but neither do you.

Really - and you know this how exactly?

As above, and I have certain books of interest.

Well not exactly. We are seeing the same types of celestial bodies now as we see 10 billion years ago. There's no onwards and upwards in space - only, possibly in life, and even that's not 100% as we have already established.

Everything we're made from had to be manufactured in a sequence it wasn't there from the start. The galaxies and stars and what have all had to form and formed adhering to a ordered structure. The process runs through the formation and evolution of life and we can clearly see the upward direction of complexity that took. Once you understand this is is how it works it's perplexing having to explain it to someone who doesn't understand it.

Whilst I might agree with the brain the human body is no great leap forwards. In fact huge parts of it appear to be very badly designed indeed.

It wasn't micromanaged but the human form is likely the form required for civilisation. There may be other alternatives that could work. The brain was part of the body last I checked and the human body is more complex than a jellyfish, a sponge, snail or whatever developed in the earlier stages. Placental mammals are more advanced than egg laying mammals and so on so you have a progression through that line as well. If you look at the planet as a whole you'll see the essential ingredients, the plants and animal needed to feed a civilisation emerge. Give it enough and this is how life ought to develop on planets such as this, it was built into the system from the start and we can observe it.

And how do you know we have reached the point of ultimate complexity?

If the human brain were any bigger it would use too much energy and it would take too long for neural transmitters to rely instructions to the different parts meaning it would be less efficient a system. So biologically we are the apex of the process of development. Intentional development that was planned from the point of creation. Once the ball was rolling this was going to happen.

Judging by the past (98% of all species that have ever lived are now extinct) there is a VERY good chance we too will go extinct to be replaced by something else.

We will go extinct eventually but not for while imo. Bear in mind that we're immortal beings though so humanity itself won't ever die out. Unless you're right of course but I think I'm demonstrating so far that you won't be. The structure, the precise natural balance, complexity the development of the universe over time you can actually see. It helps to understand what you're looking at though and you see it better in the context of faith, in the context of design and purpose. No matter how hard you want to deny it it is still there.

No evidence of design.

If you want to ignore everything I've shown you go then go ahead. It just makes you look obstinate not open minded and reasonable. You can dig yourself deep into a hole you can't ever fill.

Certainly the universe is not well designed for life

If it wasn't we wouldn't be here. Hence it had to be 100% perfect for it's development. We know how well balanced this was and it is scientifically factual. Yes so atheist scientists are ignoring it or coming up with that puddle fitting a hole story, which is complete bollocks life does not conform itself to fit the universe not with this level of exact perfect fine tuning. Life is a product of this universe being the way it is there was no alternative this is it.

that much we know. In fact the only place in the entire universe we know we can live is here.

And a pink unicorn could fly out of my bum but I don't consider that to be very likely.

There might be other places, there might not, but they are going to be a bugger to find even if they do exist.

They exist if the universe was clearly engineered to form and develop life and living planetary system by a supreme intelligence.

Source? What bird, exactly, could compete with a 400 kilogram pterosaur as tall as a giraffe?

Birds could out reproduce them and they had better access to food and nesting sites, size isn't everything. Some of the really utterly massive ones survived to the very end but there's some debate if they flew or just crawled around on the ground.

---

Lotsa if's, baseless assertions and miscomprehension.