Question for Christian Ballbags here

[Drich]

You have demonstrated that you are not looking for a resolution for anything. You just want to be angry and name call. Fore even a flaming Poe would have accepted my resignation to him on the subject of friend or neighbor.

If you wanted to find resolution you would actually go to the correct thread and answer my questions as I have asked. I am keen you are not. You ignore my questions and posts. You make false and misleading statements. I am demonstrating to you that I want resolution to my questions through my patience and my persistence in repeating the questions that you ignore.

I will ignore your angry assertion. No name calling by me. I call you something based on facts not made up shit. It was you calling me stupid when you do not understand that conceded is concede in the past tense. If you are going to name call make sure you are correct otherwise you might look like a fool.

This is from my post drich:

"I have conceded the scriptures identify him as a friend." is of course a concession, but with the added assertion that you have conceded before.

Do you see where I said "of course it is a concession". Do you understand what that means drich? It means I accepted your concession.

We can not proceed because your half of this arguement will not allow it to proceed. I am willing but you are not. I only retain the ability to move 1/2 of the conversation. I made that effort several times. I have conceded the friend or neighbor several times now, so you can make your arguement, and yet you wish to remain here so you can call me names. If this is all you have then there is nothing new I can respond to.

If you were really genuine with your effort then you would accept when you have either made a mistake, misled or lied. (see how fucking generous I am. I give you the option of mistake when really all I get most of the time is dishonesty.)

Since I have acknowledged your concession the first time that you answered my question of asking for prove of the so called previous concession. You can now move forward to my post HERE. This is either the 3rd or 4th time that I have asked you to reply to my post in which you have said you would be happy to reply to.

Do you see now who is always stalling the discussion? It is you and I wish you would admit it. But it is your choice and your integrity.

I'm not going back to any thread until a resolution can be agreed on. Why? Because you have brought the discussion here in search of a supposed resolution. I have offered one here, and there and the other thread. None of which has been satisfactory. You argue ad nausium. Meaning you simply restate your position over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again without taking into consideration any new information unless you can incorporate it into what you have repeated so many times before. So, If you wish to continue to hijack this thread then completely hijack it. Don't just hound dog it (bark from the side lines and follow me around with no point or purpose other than to make noise.) I've conceded your point now make an arguement or let it go.