Evolution Trumps Creationism

[Drich]

You still have not clearly defined the 'good samaritan parable'. Could you please tell me book chapter verse what you call 'good samaritan parable'?

luke 10;25-37

Did the friend show pity on his friend who wanted loaves?

because the guy outside would not stop A/S/King

Did the friend show mercy on his friend who wanted loaves? again what was done was not out of mercy. it was out of self intrest.

Did the friend give the loaves straight away just as the samaritan cared for the naked beaten man as soon as he saw him? No.

this is an intellectually dishonest statement. Fore there is no time frame given between the time the sameritian saw the man and he began to help him. Look at the Aid that was given to the Jew. olive oil and wine. It is possiable that he had these things, but it is also possiable he would have to get them. verse 33 says between the sameritian see the jew and helping the jew, he felt very sorry for the jew. Again no time frame was given you are forcing a time frame onto this story to support your own argument.

Do you now see how your 'good samaritan parable' does not support your use of neighbour instead of friend?

No, you have absolutely fail in trying too establish this. try again. This time don't alter the story if you don't want to appear foolish.

I have shown above where the 'good samaritan parable' does not support your use of neighbour.

The only thing you have shown is that you more than willing to change the bible to support your arguments.

So this brings us to the original question.

Why do you insist saying it was a neighbour? Now my original question is saying insist because I kept pointing out to you your use of neighbour and you just kept on using neighbour. So it was not just a case of "misspoken", you were being intellectually dishonest.

So far you have given me 2 reasons which I have shown to be false.

Again I have already concede this argument 5 times just so you can make your argument. Either get on with it or I will be forced to shake the dust from my feet and move past you.

Above I have special sentences up there with question marks(?). They call them questions. You know the ones that you do not avoid unless "the question is an attempt to derail the topic or is just beligerantly disrespectful or blasphmous.".

[/quote]This is another intelectually dishonest statement as well. For you are well aware Not all questions are meant to be answered, these are called rhetorical questions. Since you have the answers to your questions then there is no need for me to answer or correct you.