(October 15, 2013 at 8:59 am)Drich Wrote:So if my argument already fails according to you , you must know what that argument is. What was my argument? If you don't remember then you do not have an open mind. Is this your problem drich that you decide on an argument before you know what it is. Sad.(October 15, 2013 at 12:59 am)Waratah Wrote: Always looking for an out to cover your lying.Your arguement fails either way whether it was a neighbor or friend that is why i do not understand why you are stuck on this.
So we will accept that your excuses were lies.
Even your excuse of saying "Because for me the word means the same thing." does not stack up. All these posts for you to say that does not make sense. What does make sense is you trying to discredit my argument for seek via the use of neighbour instead of friend.
Restate you arguement and I will refute it with 'friend' inplace of neighbor. also leave a link to your orginal arguement just to show your 'honesty.'
Quote:Which brings me to the only logical reason i see for you to care so much about the crap you have been making a fuss over, you loose on content either way it is read. It seems the only way you can even semi legitmatly argue anything is to argue semantics, which is all that you have done for 2 or 3 weeks. This make you a petty little man who lashes out at anything and everything that he has in his power to lash out with.Your problem is that you hate being wrong. I showed that you were wrong with your use of neighbour instead of friend. I have asked why you did that. You came up with 2 excuses which I was able to point out that they were lies. You refuse to reply to my posts, using excuses that are false(lies really).
Your logic is weird. Remember your comprehension of the good samaritan parable where you stated that it says anyone that you come in close proximity to is a neighbour.

Quote:Because your theology is next to none existance you grade papers and look for subtal inconsistancies and then blow them up even if they meaning nothing nor have any bearing on a topical discussion.The fallacy of authority again? It clearly states to receive the holy spirit you must ask him. No a/s/k.
Quote:Please show where in that post you are showing that christ converts asking into knocking? You should read Cthulhu Dreaming post again because it explains why a/s/k is not needed for the holy spirit. I suspect that the reason why Cthulhu Dreaming did not reply to your post is because somehow you have the audacity to make shit up and say it was combined and ignore the clear explanation of how it is not combined. Your logic is weird.Quote:Now I would like you now to show me where christ converts the asking into knocking?https://atheistforums.org/thread-20901-page-23.html Post 229
Quote:In a post.Quote:Just as reminder you said thiswhere did I say this??
"knocking as described by Christ is the repetive nature of the asking, and the fact this man remained at his neighbors door step asking/petitioning his neighbor for the bread he desperately needed."
Please don't keep on repeating answers that I have shown to be false.
My above answer is a drich answer.