RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
October 27, 2013 at 9:10 am
(This post was last modified: October 27, 2013 at 9:10 am by Chas.)
(October 27, 2013 at 8:51 am)enrico Wrote:(October 26, 2013 at 11:56 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Eegs and MRI demonstrate that aptly. People I have died hook into both so we could observe the process well. We also can measure what is going on in a persons brain using both and through the Montreal procedure we have mapped most of the limbic system and proven that electric stimulation is what produces thoughts and sensations.
Wrong again.
We are talking about consciousness not brain activity which i can agree with you to a certain extend.
There is evidence that consciousness can be separated from the body when the body is dead or is in a coma or other states of non response.
People under these states have seen their bodies lying down while they (their consciousness) go up above the body.
From there they have seen what was inside other rooms which they never been there.
After going back (their consciousness) into their previous body they explained what was inside other rooms to people who were present in the hospital.
After checking in the rooms that the NDE experiencer described they found the things that he saw when he was not in his body.
One more example.
One Nde saw a nurse dropping a baby on the ground and the baby fractured some bones.
The nurse did not tell anything to anyone for fear to get into trouble and nobody could understand why the baby was crying so loud.
When the NDE came back into his body explained what happened so the doctors could fix the baby fracture.
Now if you are right about your so called evidence how would you explain all this?
Can your stimuli create a situation in which the mind can see through the wall?
Of course no, that is why your evidence is the usual bullshit.
You're hilarious, enrico. You spew a bunch of shit about NDEs, without any evidence or citations, and then call actual science bullshit?
Your lack of intellectual honesty is sad.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.