RE: Why is having a mod on the ignore list against rules?
October 28, 2013 at 11:08 am
(This post was last modified: October 28, 2013 at 11:12 am by Tiberius.)
When you break the rules time and time again, then come back and complain about being called an anti-semite whilst in the same thread calling another member a child abuser, there isn't much of a choice you are giving the staff. That kind of behaviour is considered libelous in a number of countries.
(October 28, 2013 at 11:07 am)Zazzy Wrote: I liked TGAC, and his posts here didn't seem much worse in terms of personal attacks than I've seen elsewhere here. Is it that he attacked the boss?No. He called someone a child abuser in this thread. For me, that already steps over the line of what is acceptable behaviour. To do it so soon after being officially warned for another rule violation is just plain stupid.
Quote:Also, I don't see Tj***pii (however he spells that) as being a worse flamer than others here. How is this sort of thing decided?Read the rules. Generally speaking, attacks have to have some kind of personal aspect to them. Over the top flaming is a punishable offense. Of course, if you feel that someone has violated the rules, use the report button. We can't be in every thread on the forums at all times...we will miss things.
