I saw Dawkins himself write on his RDF forums (to paraphrase: ) that he believes that 'Climbing Mount Improbable' is actually a better book than 'The Blind Watchmaker' (according to him), and that he thinks he might attribute the greater success of 'The Blind Watchmaker' to perhaps a superior title. And that it is of course really the content and not the title that matters.
EvF
EvF