(October 28, 2013 at 11:40 pm)catfish Wrote: Yes, I had that freedom and I used it well.
So you think because a kid might learn something about sexuality that that gives you (secular society) the right to (force) teach them things regarding sex?
Show me where, on the books, outside of a regular sex education class, such lessons occur. Shouldn't be hard, if our secular government is such a hive of iniquity for you poor, cherry picking christians.
Quote:In the guise of anti-descrimination, the goverment forced into (our -Pennsylvania's) public school curriculum positive depictions of homosexual relationships (I forget the exact wording).
Big hint: a lack of negative descriptions- read: discrimination- does not equal an endorsement. It just means public schools are no longer allowed to be cockheads about this.
Quote:You better watch what the fuck you say about my kids, asswipe.
I'm saying your kids are better than the bigotries you seem to want to install in them. Can you produce another- non bigoted- reason you might want to teach your kids that there's something wrong with gay people?
Quote:Yes, the one that showed in clinical studies a 5% reduction in cervical cancer (just enough to claimd efficacy). While at the same time showing a 5-10% increase in infection rate of the disease they were immunizing against. Again, public school, forced vaccinations...
Was there an actual link determined between the vaccination itself and the disease, or did instances of the disease just go up. And, again, it's kind of optional over here, in my entirely secular government that was run by an atheist up until a little while ago, so... I'd suggest it isn't secularism at fault for that, anyway.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!