RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
November 9, 2013 at 9:55 am
(This post was last modified: November 9, 2013 at 10:28 am by Little Rik.)
(November 7, 2013 at 1:32 pm)Rationalman Wrote:(November 7, 2013 at 10:26 am)enrico Wrote: 1) You say that you know what a theory is and you say that they are facts and evidence.
I already said that not all theory are backed up by facts and evidence.
Yes they are. If they are not backed up by evidence, then they are not theories. They are ideas or hypotheses, much like every religion today. You really have no idea how much time, money and effort is put into testing theories, do you? How rigorously they are scrutinized or how they are compiled
My spiritual teacher said regarding reading............THERE ARE 3 IMPORTANT THINGS TO DO WHEN YOU READ
1) BE ABLE TO READ
2) UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU READ
3) REMEMBER WHAT YOU HAVE READ
Unfortunately you only know how to read.
I already explained that originally theories were thinking of something and try to make some sort of conclusion out of it possibly turn the theories into practice.
With the passing of time people gave different meaning.
You can give the meaning that you like but do not pretend that i agree with you about the real meaning of the word theory
Too many words have been vandalized and their meaning changed 100%.
When i hear that a certain person serve in the army i feel sick in my guts.
Nobody serve in the army.
Serve come the Latin or the Etruscan and mean servus or slave so as far as someone get paid for doing a job he-she is not a slave and therefore is not serving.
I know you guys did not studied Latin so you wouldn't know the real meaning of the words but at least you shouldn't have the audacity to come out with so called truth.
Yours are just THEORIES without foundation NOT BACKED UP BY EVIDENCE.
(November 7, 2013 at 1:12 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: Enrice, I'm gonna share a little secret with you. Truth's don't change.
Gee, this time i agree with you.
Kudos given
(November 7, 2013 at 11:08 am)whateverist Wrote: Don't forget to employ your intuition scientifically, Enrico. You can do it. What's in the green box?
Eh, i am only a white belt.
When i get the black belt i will tell you.
But not really.
Even when i will get the black belt i will not tell you.
Have you ever seen a master going around the street to show his-her skills?
The last thing that the masters do is to show their skills to unbelievers.
Eventually they show to believers
You got to establish a real relationship with someone that you trust in order to enjoy love In this case spiritual love.
What's the point into show not believers something good
The rule is that you give fodder to donkeys and royal jelly to love ones.
(November 6, 2013 at 10:49 am)whateverist Wrote:(November 6, 2013 at 10:04 am)enrico Wrote: What is science if not the gathering of knowledge.
Where you think it is located most of the knowledge?
Within this physical arena or universe?
Are you joking?
The old saying............IF YOU WANT TO KNOW EVERYTHING YOU MUST KNOW YOURSELF.
And this work is done within not outside in this physical world.
This work and this science is called INTUITIONAL SCIENCE.
Looks like we may be talking past one another as to the use of the word "science". Below is the beginning of the wiki entry.
Here it addresses the modern use of the word which we have been pointing out doesn't fit with what you've been calling Intuitional Science:
Quote:In modern usage, "science" most often refers to a way of pursuing knowledge, not only the knowledge itself. It is also often restricted to those branches of study that seek to explain the phenomena of the material universe.[6] In the 17th and 18th centuries scientists increasingly sought to formulate knowledge in terms of laws of nature such as Newton's laws of motion. And over the course of the 19th century, the word "science" became increasingly associated with the scientific method itself, as a disciplined way to study the natural world, including physics, chemistry, geology and biology.
And here is the other use of "science", still in use, which you have been claiming. Looks like I have been mistaken to insist on the other usage exclusively.
Quote:However, "science" has also continued to be used in a broad sense denoting reliable, teachable knowledge about a topic, as in modern terms like library science or computer science. This is also reflected in the names of some areas of academic study such as "social science" or "political science".
So if you don't mind placing your Intuition Science on the shelf beside Library Science, Computer Science and Political Science .. rather than on the shelf reserved for the natural sciences whose study employs the scientific method .. I think I can stop calling Intutional Science oxymoronic. Deal?
No deal mate.
Real science is a lot older then modern science.
In fact the first science goes back 7000 years ago when Lord Shiva gave INTUITIONAL SCIENCE.
Your link say that science is related mainly to this physical universe.
What a crap!!!
This physical universe is external to us therefore is not as important as the science that study what is within.
The old saying.............IF YOU WANT TO KNOW ALL YOU WILL HAVE TO KNOW YOURSELF.........and this require to extract the knowledge from within rather then from the external arena.