(November 11, 2013 at 8:47 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(November 11, 2013 at 8:42 pm)snowtracks Wrote: researcher haven't found that to be true - after panspermia lost it appeal due to ultraviolet radiation studies demonstrating that bacterial spores couldn't survive inter-stellar travel, researchers turned their attention to focusing on finding chemical routes that would produce molecular building blocks. after researching for decades, paul davies wrote investigators are baffled at this point but won't admit it publicly due to concern that funding will be curtailed. so stealthy, have turned their attention back to panspermia with a twist which is travel only within earth's solar system; hence the big hullabaloo about mars and it's moons.
So you're resorting to arguments from ignorance again?
Seriously, even if they haven't found it yet, it doesn't mean there was a designer. Rather than poking holes in the available science- and relying on your profound misunderstanding of such to do so- you need to provide positive evidence for your position.
evidence of life on planet earth has been discovered as early as 3.8 billion years ago. this places life's marker right after the heavy sun radiation bombardment period. this wasn't suppose to happen per the naturalism model, but even they say this is the evidence and they will have to deal with it.
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.