Correct. I am exactly saying that there is no scientific evidence for a global flood. None. Disagree with it all you like. However, I am not trying to justify ignorance of the bible at all- I'm in the process of reading it, actually. I think it's important to know my subject matter. What is more important to me is the balancing of evidences- the bible does not weigh heavy on the scale, for me, in comparison to many scientifically verifiable findings.
Also- when I say natural laws I mean things like the earth revolving around the sun, mathematical truths like the Pi ratio, and even the idea that all the animals on earth were within walking distance of Noah's house. All of which the bible is wrong about, interpretation not necessary, it's plainly stated.
Also- when I say natural laws I mean things like the earth revolving around the sun, mathematical truths like the Pi ratio, and even the idea that all the animals on earth were within walking distance of Noah's house. All of which the bible is wrong about, interpretation not necessary, it's plainly stated.


