(November 19, 2013 at 4:12 am)Aractus Wrote: Yes, chance cannot play a role. Just as the laws of chemistry don't exist by chance, nor do the laws of biology, and nor does the process by which life starts, everything has its order in its own set of rules that are derived from - or formed out of the environment in which they operate. How and why we do not know.
Why can't it just be patterns in physical responses to stimuli that humans see in nature?
Quote:Does life really self-start, and if so how? I think it does, but we have no idea how it does only to say that just as the laws of crystallography exist, seemingly without clear reason or logic, so does the rudimentary fundamental biological laws. If this is really the case though, and I should stress this point, then life should have been created trillions upon trillions of times by now here on Earth, and there should be new life forms self-starting all the time - not based on some "primordial soup" stage of Earth or any of that nonsense, and it should be observable. So I do predict that someday we will observe it, however as at yet we haven't and it could well be that I'm wrong and that only God and not the laws of nature (which of course he created) is able to create life itself.
More importantly, why are you discarding the idea of primordial soup so out of hand? This line of logic makes absolutely no sense; why can't it be that the conditions for an abiogenetic event were only present on an older earth, and that those conditions have since changed into what we have today? Other than simply dismissing the idea, why can't that be the case?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
