Abiogenesis is impossible

[snowtracks]

get a load of the atheists, pretending not to know the common meaning of - consciousness, information, instruction, living vs nonliving, functionality. but yet they want to portray themselves as intelligent ones. well, bring it on then, where that's science you keep touting? and no we don't want hear about any assertions that appeal to the future - that lamer only has a limited shelf life and it just expired.

So tell us how to scientifically measure and quantify information, Snowy. It should be easy, given how confident you are that it's scientific.

Other than that, I think the fallacies in your post stand out to anyone with a functioning mind.

one problem for undirected spontaneous interactions from a prebiotic compound is that the dna complimentary 2 strands that form the double helix construction cannot bind with each other unless all the building blocks (nucleotides) are of the same handedness (here, all 19 are left handed). nature and lab experiments have shown nonbiological processes produce molecules in essentially 50% (even distribution of right, left) which corresponds to randomness, whereas encoded information (building instructions) directs handedness from the get-go.