RE: Unfortunately the atheist will have to stand up and go
December 4, 2013 at 2:16 am
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2013 at 2:18 am by DOS.)
Quote:Okay, this has already become stupidly retarded and self-refuting. What do you mean by 'laws'? The legal sense? If anything other than that, then it becomes nonsense. Does he reject the laws of thought? Self-refuting. Does he ignore his own moral positions? Meaningless. You can't reject everything, that's meaningless.
What do you mean by legal sense? If two men fight each other I am sure everyone of them has a legal sense to fight.
Laws of thought! Again when two men fight each other because of laws of thought!
When Obama wanted to bomb Syria and Putin stopped him who of the two had more legal sense and the laws of thought???
Quote:Contradiction. If he "rejected everything", as you just quoted Dostoevski as saying, then he had NO principles; he rejected them all.Contradiction! If he rejected everything then he wouldn't be eating and would have died in a month so and no without drinking he would die even sooner! Contradiction!
Quote:This bit is a clusterfuck of more nonsense. It's exactly the same religious nonsense we hear from theists who are stupidly ignorant and/or arrogant, and wax on about the "darkness of atheism", and peddle ridiculous nonsense like the above. Dostoevski can't even keep his story from contradicting, and even if he did, it becomes nothing more than value-ladden nonsense and pompous superiority - with no justification - mixed with straw manning and projection.This is why I find it nonsensical when theists show up here with questions like "what is the atheist position on X?"Do you believe in afterlife?
(December 3, 2013 at 6:03 pm)TaraJo Wrote:(December 3, 2013 at 12:47 pm)DOS Wrote: In plain English tell you what? What's the point regarding what? You disagree with Dostoevsky and find a fallacy in the text/quote of his? What's the point since you don't understand in asking me what's the point?
Simply this: it sounds to me like you're one of those guys who likes to go around and use complex words and phrases in an attempt to make himself sound smart. To me, it sounds like even you don't understand what Dostevsky is saying, but you're going to agree wth it since it speaks well of theists. Me, I'd like to see if you can live up to the standards Al here sets:
So, can you explain, simply, what he means?
Why did you put up the picture of Einstein?
"Dostoevsky gives me more than any scientist, more than Gauss." - Albert Einstein.
Simple enough?