(December 9, 2013 at 6:42 am)Esquilax Wrote:It depends. What about apes that descended from man a long time ago? I am personally don't care, it's just a much easier to associate the atheists with apes.(December 9, 2013 at 6:35 am)DOS Wrote: That does not count for a valid proof. Dinasaur skeleton is proof but where is the proof of yours that the man descended from the ape?
Oh, a dinosaur skeleton would count as proof for you? So then, all the skeletons in the fossil record of man's apelike ancestors would also count, wouldn't it? The ones in the evidence that I linked you to earlier, that you ignored? Just like I predicted you would continue to do?
Or hell, the genetic similarities between humanity and ape, that conclusively prove that?
Or maybe the fact that you don't get to determine what valid proof is, in order to dishonestly exclude everything you dislike? Maybe that helps?
If you don't provide a proof next post then I would consider you an emotinal woman on the verge of Schizophrenia.