RE: Philosophical problems with science.
December 12, 2013 at 9:30 am
(This post was last modified: December 12, 2013 at 9:38 am by LostLocke.)
It's very simple....
From all his posts on this site and back on TTA, before he was banned, I&I made it very clear he doesn't what science is or how it works.
So, all his opinions and thoughts on it are wrong, invalid, and unimportant.
From all his posts on this site and back on TTA, before he was banned, I&I made it very clear he doesn't what science is or how it works.
So, all his opinions and thoughts on it are wrong, invalid, and unimportant.
(December 12, 2013 at 3:31 am)I and I Wrote: "Explaining observations" is determined by ones historical place in time, education therefore class, ideologies, religions, all which can and often do form what kinds of observations and questions are formed.So, if an American scientist within recent history said he discovered the rate of gravitational acceleration on Earth is 9.8m/s², you're saying that rate will be different for people who are poor than it is for rich people? That rate will be different for a conservative than it is a liberal? That rate will be different for a socialist than it will be for a capitalist? That rate will be different for someone from 1700 than it will be for someone from 2200? That rate will be different for someone who flunked high school than it will be for someone with 5 masters degrees?
