Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 6:09 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The cosmological argument really needs to die already.
#16
RE: The cosmological argument really needs to die already.
(December 13, 2013 at 12:28 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote: The argument is literally older then jesus., it was started by aristotle

EXACTLY. Also, my problem with this argument is it originated as a 'prime mover' or 'first mover', because according to common logic at the time, people know that things didn't move unless they are acted apon, due to basic physics, and that a being would have to 'move' everything into motion. Now, that concept has been misconstrued to creation ex nihilo, which is why there are so many problems when you do this kind of metaphysics.

(December 12, 2013 at 6:47 pm)feeling Wrote: William Craig really likes to put this shit over and over. It was debunked 1000 times yet he keeps on doing it. But oh well.

Gah, William Lane Craig. There is no one else that puffs his case for god up larger than it actually is. For example he claims there are good grounds for believing the historicity of the bible, and this is flat out false. The bible is a collection of Chinese whispers over many decades, with stories of stories being written down, edited, changed, rewritten, changed more, all by anonymous sources who we have no clue it was written by. Historically, a Resurrection of Jesus supported by the bible, is about as realistic as a spiderman saving the city supported by the spiderman comics. All religious people have is a book that says so, with all sorts of conflicting information, all from second, third, fourth hand accounts decades after the events from biased sources. The historical basis for the bible is a fucking joke, and anyone that believes it, does so not on evidence, but faith. And if you believe in it on faith, you have absolutely no good intellectual reason to do so, and you are automatically discarded from any serious intellectual discussion. Anyone that seeks truth will become an atheistic/agnostic, those that seek comfort blanket in a random chaotic universe will become theistic. Sure, religious people can believe what they want, but they should know that their beliefs has no basis in reality of skepticism, science, critical thinking, and intellectual discourse: And WLC doesn't do just that, he claims that his god is widely supported by science and history.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The cosmological argument really needs to die already. - by Freedom of thought - December 13, 2013 at 1:38 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Kalam Cosmological Argument Disagreeable 123 13022 December 15, 2024 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  The Cosmological Proof LinuxGal 53 8065 September 24, 2023 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Proving What We Already "Know" bennyboy 171 27778 July 30, 2022 at 1:40 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Shouldn't the right to die be a human right? ErGingerbreadMandude 174 28654 February 4, 2017 at 7:52 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  How do you punish people that want to die? ReptilianPeon 16 4985 July 5, 2015 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Leibnizian Cosmological Argument MindForgedManacle 7 3105 September 18, 2013 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: MindForgedManacle
  Questions on the Kalam Cosmological argument MindForgedManacle 10 3498 July 26, 2013 at 9:37 am
Last Post: little_monkey
  Something that can strengthen the cosmological argument? Mystic 1 1769 April 8, 2013 at 6:23 am
Last Post: A_Nony_Mouse
  Right to die Welsh cake 49 20136 July 26, 2012 at 7:22 pm
Last Post: Reforged
  Simple existence - Cosmological argument leading to God Mystic 5 4206 June 14, 2012 at 4:26 am
Last Post: genkaus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)