Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 29, 2024, 3:07 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
#42
RE: Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)
(December 15, 2013 at 6:36 pm)Chas Wrote:
(December 15, 2013 at 5:51 pm)Brakeman Wrote: One sidereal day is the time it takes for a star in the sky to come back to the same place in the sky. Because, for all intents and purposes, the sky is “fixed”, a sidereal day is when the earth rotates 360°. A sidereal day is 23 hours 56 minutes and 4.09 seconds long.

A Solar day is variable, some days are longer than others depending on the season. Have you never read a farmer's almanac??
The reason for the leap years is to correlate sidereal years with solar years and their timing is not exact nor a multiple of nine.

Your magic "nine" shit is pathetic.

Furthermore, if we re-cast this in base 16, we get:
5A0 minutes in a day = adds up to F
15180 seconds in a day = adds up to F
2760 minutes in a week = adds up to F
80520 minutes in a year = adds up to F

F is the magic number!

Base 10 is the only system that corresponds to and reflects physical reality. All other bases are bogus. The base 10 system was not invented but discovered in nature.

1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8 = 36 = 9
9 is the sum of all digits in a base 10, try that with any other base.

at the same time you cannot distuingish between a 9 and a 0 using the digital root method. 9 models everything and nothing simultaneously. It is both the singularity and the vacuum.

9 + any digit will return the same.

the number 9 has unique properties other numbers do not have and its the invisible driving force.

(December 15, 2013 at 6:57 pm)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(December 15, 2013 at 6:28 pm)insider432 Wrote: This has nothing to do with faith...assumptions over assumptions...not everyone who presents evidence of creation is a religious nut you know...im against religions, now you know so pls dont bring it up again. This has nothing to do with religion but science.

Yes, well it doesn't then your assertion has just been challenged on various point by me and two other users successfully.

Dont think so. You have provided nothing to challenge any of this. First spend some time understanding what i pointed out to you because you clearly don't. This is not about God but the fact that this physical universe is a creation, nothing more and nothing less. Either certain forces are intelligent themselves and therefor inherit consciousness OR those unseen forces are governed by some sort of intelligence, there are no other options. to label this chance or coincidence reflects the highest form of ignorance.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof) - by insider432 - December 15, 2013 at 6:59 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Can a lack of evidence be considered proof? ignoramus 26 5650 February 1, 2017 at 11:39 am
Last Post: Asmodee
  Can you still be an atheist if you believe in the paranormal? Regina 28 7881 February 14, 2015 at 1:36 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Fundamental flaw in the creation/evolution debate Baalzebutt 34 9842 May 1, 2013 at 2:46 am
Last Post: AtheistPilot
  "Creation Science", "Flood Geology", etc Justtristo 10 5114 December 21, 2010 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: Justtristo



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)