RE: Can we see reality as it is?
December 30, 2013 at 8:01 pm
(This post was last modified: December 30, 2013 at 8:03 pm by bennyboy.)
(December 30, 2013 at 5:39 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:People talk about reality, but they should talk about reality AS. Experiences are real-- as experiences. Red is really red. The taste of hot chocolate on a winter day is really just that. We are experiencing those things as they really are, because they are experiences. Do those experiences represent some underlying, objective reality? Not really.(December 30, 2013 at 5:19 pm)bennyboy Wrote: To answer the OP:I respectively disagree. We do see reality as it is, we simply do not see all of reality since we are not omniscient.
No, we can't. All we can see is that some, many or most experiences seem consistent with each other-- or at least with an idea we have about what underlies them.
But when the OP starts talking about "true reality," what does that mean? He wants to know whether a true objectivity, resulting in true understanding of what is real, is possible. My position is that it's impossible to know while still maintaining sentience. So long as you are perceiving, how can you ever know that what you think is cool, objective observation, isn't really just another layer of self-delusion?
(December 30, 2013 at 8:00 pm)TudorGothicSerpent Wrote: Thinking about it too much is kind of like staring into the abyss, only instead of staring back, it starts ranting off gibberish about wave functions.


