(January 1, 2014 at 2:03 pm)Stimbo Wrote:Or would you equally conclude that the belief in the existence of gods can't be relied on for guidance? ----- no, because there are duel sources of revelation: book of nature, book of biblical scripture which are in agreement. not possible to perceive God's identity or attributes thru the 5 senses.(December 31, 2013 at 8:50 pm)snowtracks Wrote: if the evolutionary theory brought forth brains that are patchwork and flawed and as a result the God/religious fallacy was introduced, that same evolutionary brain that now has evolved further to concluded 'no God/religion' can't be relied on for guidance.
Massive non sequitur notwithstanding, this of course is why the basic atheist position is not "no God". Or would you equally conclude that the belief in the existence of gods can't be relied on for guidance?
And did you seriously just equate "God" with religion with a straight face?
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.