reasons to believe, there is no God

[Watson]

tavarish, your Invisible Pink Unicorn argument is not only regurgitated from the same tired old idea used in an atheistic viewpoint over and over again, it is also faulty because of the nature of your so-called 'Invisible Pink Unicorn.' The suggestion that thisUnicorn exists supposes that there must be a physical or biological entity known as the Invisible Pink Unicorn, and that it could, in theory, be found or constructed or proven.

She is transcendent and eternal. There goes your argument. You can't see her either. Blessed be her hooves.

I love you, tavarish. Your ignorance knows no bounds. If she's transcendant and eternal, she doesn't have hooves(although she could if she wanted to!) Also, nice way to completely contradict yourself by saying you can't see her. If she's transcendant and eternal, you look around and...wow there she is!

This pales in comparison to the idea of what God is supposed to be, which is a being free of tethers such as biological or physical existance and exists merely on a plain of it's own. The nature of God is different from the nature of your IPU because He is an entity which exists everywhere simultaneously, exists in a way that is non-physical, and exists beyond the scope of anything less than spiritual perception.

You assumed the nature of the Invisible Pink Unicorn, and you were wrong. She is everywhere and is transcendent, and the creator of the universe. Those who don't believe in her can't understand her. You need to believe her to feel her. Blessed be her hooves.

This is true. You can't understand love without feeling love. God is love, so...there you go. But if the IPU is everywhere and transcendant, then she...isn't a Unicorn. At all.

The IPU as you present it, however, presuppoes that the entity of God could perhaps be touched or seen or perceived in a lesser state than that of God. If you really want to talk about a being like that, let's start a topic about Angels and you can bring up your personal 'Angel', the IPU, there.

Wrong again. She is not an angel. She is an all encompassing, all knowing, all loving pink unicorn that just happens to be invisible and transcendent. Blessed be her hooves.

"Invisible and transcendant." That's so contradictory I don't even know where to begin. Blasted foolishness.