(February 28, 2010 at 9:46 pm)Watson Wrote: I came to what now? Wrong. I came to the conclusion, by observing reality, that it is entirely within God's nature to do something such as having a son 2000 years ago. That does not necessarily mean it happened, it just means that it could happen.
You limit yourself to a word, I do not. That's the biiiig difference here.
You call yourself Christian, which means you abide by and acknowledge the Nicene Creed. You're not a biblical literalist, so I don't see you taking on a sola scriptura view. The big difference is you're wholly inconsistent and intellectually dishonest when it comes to articulating your point. You seem to be horribly misinformed and make ridiculously vapid claims when talking about free thinking and subscribing to a belief system. Your points have been addressed on multiple occasions, yet you still come back with the same garbage. You have a lot of growing to do.
